Acts
Chapter 19.
Paul comes to Ephesus
and re-baptizes certain disciples of John. 19:1-7
Paul preaches at Ephesus,
and confirms the Word by miracles. 19:8-12.
The defeat of certain Jewish exorcists. 19:13-17.
Many converted, and confess their sins. 19:18-20.
The apostles propose to leave Ephesus. 19:21-22.
Demetrius excites a tumalt at Ephesus. 19:23-27.
The mob seize two of
Paul's companions, rush to the theatre. 19:28-34.
Speech of the town-clerk, who quietens the uproar and
disperses the multitude. 19:35-41.
Paul's Long
Stay. The apostle
remained at Ephesus
for about three years. See 20:21.
Bruce, proposes it as from Autumn 52 to Summer 55.
Luke was not with him during this time and so he would not
be fully acquainted with Paul's trials and afflictions while at Ephesus. The book of Acts say very little of his
sufferings during his Ephesian ministry.
But from the Corinthian Epistles we gather they must have been the most
perilous years of his life. Often he
despaired of life itself. (1.Cor.15:29,32;
2.Cor.1:8; 4:8-12; 6:4-5;
11:23-27. See also Rom.16:7.
Ephesus
was the capital of the Roman Province of Asia. B-D. 380, see also B-D. 98 (Asia)
and 1052 (Province).
Pauline Correspondence.
B-D. 949. Paul used
letter-writing as an opportunity for pastoral work. He wrote wonderful letters. His epistles were written in the
"hurl-burly" of missionary work and reflects the problems of the
mission field.
During his Ephesian ministry Paul wrote four letters to the
Corinthian church.
* The so-called
"Previous" letter, see 1.Cor.5:9.R.V.
* Our first letter to Corinth,
see 1.Cor.16:5-9, 19.
Sometime after
this Paul seems to have made a short visit to Corinth
from Ephesus. This proved a painful experience. See
2.Cor.2:1.
* The "severe letter". Titus may have taken this letter to Corinth and Paul went to Troas to await his return but,
becoming more anxious, he crossed to Macedonia where he met Titus. See 2.Cor.2:2-14. Titus brought good news of improved relations
at Corinth. This gave Paul great cheer. This "severe letter" has been lost,
though some scholars hold that part of it has been preserved in our second
letter to Corinth
chapters 10-13. We are inclined to
accept our second letter as a unity.
* Paul now writes our second letter to Corinth.
It may have been written from somewhere in Macedonia. The situation in which 2nd Corinthians was
written is clearly set forth in the second chapter of the epistle itself.
Paul knew the power of the pen and, by his written ministry,
achieved far greater things than by his oral ministry.
Paul later makes a further visit to Corinth.
See Acts 20:23.
Disciples who were half-Christian. Disciples of John. B-D. 641. 19:1-7.
* Inquiry into their
spiritual experience. Paul discerned
that they had a lack, for like Apollos they had been disciples of John
the Baptist. Paul's query was, "Did
you receive the Holy Ghost when you believed?" R.V.
Literally, "on believing."
This is the force of the coincident aorist participle. (Bruce). Compare Greek of Eph.1:13.
MacGrossan defends the "since" of the A.V. and
belittles the scholarship of those who disagree with him. But "when" is preferred to
"since" by R.V., N.E.B and all important translators and
commentators. MacGrossan's use of
Goodwin's book is dishonest.
The note of Rackham is to the point: The A.V. "have ye
received......since ye believed", is very misleading. The meaning of the Greek tenses is
unmistakable. They describe neither a
gradual process, nor a reception at some interval after believing, but a
definite gift at a definite moment.
"Did ye receive......when ye believed (that is, when ye professed
your belief at baptism)." That
Paul did refer to the moment of baptism is proved by his next question. This note of Rackham expresses well the
teaching of Acts, that the gift of the Spirit is linked with baptism which is
seen as a point of entrance into the Christian life. (See B-D. 131).
* Ignorance of the
Disciples. They reply that they had not
heard that there is a Holy Ghost. The
R.V. may have given the true meaning by supplying the word,
"given." If this is so, then
it means they were ignorant of Pentecost and did not know that the Holy Ghost
was available.
* Inadequacy of
John's Baptism. These disciples knew
only John's Baptism and were ignorant of the gift of the Holy Spirit. Now Paul's inquiry as to their Baptism
indicates that the normal order was to receive the Holy Ghost at Baptism. The words, "when ye believed......unto
what then, were ye baptized?"
Indicates the close relationship between faith and baptism and as a
condition of receiving the Holy Ghost.
Baptism was the initial rite of faith and one's public entrance into the
Christian life. By linking the gift of
the Spirit with baptism it is seen as a gift for all believers and that from
the beginning of their Christian life.
However faith is cardinal and without faith in Christ baptism becomes
a meaningless rite.
* Incorporation into
Christ. Paul baptized them into the
Name of the Lord Jesus. This gave their
faith a new direction. They no longer
looked for the One to come, but were now incorporated into the community of the
risen Lord.
It was not the mode of baptism that gave a new validity to
their faith, the mode would be the same in both cases. The validity of their baptismal faith
consisted in that they were baptized in the Name of the Lord Jesus.
* Imposition of
hands. B-D. 724. This act was not to confirm the disciples,
but to confirm their baptism. At Samaria (Chap.8), the official leaders of the Church of Jerusalem, confirmed and authenticated
the baptism of the Samaritans. See
Lampe's fine book, "The Seal of the Spirit."
The disciples at Ephesus
might question Paul's authority to supersede the baptism of John and to
re-baptize them into the Name of the Lord Jesus. Could it be an unjustified instance of
anabaptism? In laying on his hands, Paul
acts with the same authority as Peter and John had done at Samaria and Paul's authority and leadership
is openly attested by the Holy Spirit.
* Inspiration of the
Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit came upon
them and they spoke with tongues and prophesied. In this way the apostolic authority and
leadership of Paul is confirmed and also his action in baptizing them.
Paul's
Ministry at Ephesus. B-D. 380.
* Power of his
ministry. 19:8-12.
* Pageantry of
strolling Jews. 19:13-18. R.V. The strolling Jews were wandering or
itinerate exorcists. An exorcist was
one who cast out demons by magical formulas.
Sceva was a father of one such group.
B-D. 1149.
* Progress
report. 19:19-20.
* Paul's
purpose. 19:21-22.
The journey to Jerusalem
was actually a journey to Rome. "I must see also Rome." (23:11). Paul's destiny was becoming clear.
The end of the book of Acts is becoming defined.
* Pagan
religion. 19:23-41.
Gross superstition combined with greed and
craft. The craftsmen who traded in
superstition saw in the progress of the Christian movement a threat to their
sordid trade.
Ephesus
was a centre for the worship of Diana. B-D. 311. The Greeks identified her with their Artemis,
but she was in many ways, distinct, being a fertility deity. The Artemis of Ephesus was thought of in
terms of a queen bee loaded with eggs.
Asiarchs of 19:31 R.V. were provincial officials responsible
for the festival in adoration of the Emperor.
B-D. 98.
The town-clerk, B-D. 1287, handled an ugly situation with
great skill.
At Ephesus
we see gross superstition in a life and death struggle with the Gospel.
Evangelism.
Paul used the Synagogue, 19:8 and, when the door was closed
there, he used the school or lecture hall of Tyrannus. His means and methods were marked by
flexibleness. Demonstration from
Scripture, personal testimony, instruction and controversy would all form part
of his equipment.
Ephesus
would become a centre from which the surrounding areas would be
evangelized. It may have been Epaphras
who evangelized the Lycus
Valley. B-D. 378. See Col.1:7;
4:2.
No comments:
Post a Comment